After reading chapter two, I think that developmental
psychology is really a mix of everything. I think that a lot of things help change and
shape us, such as experiences, as well as our base concept of things that we
learned in our adolescent developmental years. The more I am learning about
this, the more I think it is up to interpretation. That being stated, through
the reading I found one thing really interesting that made me about Ivan Pavlov,
on page 40. I just really can’t wrap my head around his experiment with the
dogs and the salvation. His experiment has always intrigued me because it is so
out of the box thinking and explains classical conditioning so well. I think one reason why it interests me so much
is because the whole experiment is so ingénues and I myself can’t imagine
putting an experiment like that together. I can also relate to this concept because I
myself am a nanny. I have seen over the years how children react to certain
thins due to the way their parents “condition” them along with reinforcement. For example, I have nannyed a set of 2 year
old triplets; they knew that if they cried long enough, they would get the
attention or object that they wanted. They also realized that the more dramatic
they were the faster they would receive it. I find this interesting because it
is an experience that I have had and observed which would be the wrong type of
reinforcement which actually counteracts the wanting of the behavior stopped.
No comments:
Post a Comment