There was a lot of information talked about this week about learning
from newborn to toddlers. One thing that really peaked my interest was the
stages developmental growth. As this topic was further researched I found I
came upon an article talking about an experiment that was done with babies. The
experiment was based on the fact that babies are known to stare longer and an
action or object if that thing surprises them or challenges their expectations.
After the scientist discussed what kind of experiment they came up with one involving
food and toys. They started with crackers and milk and distributed it evenly as
the baby watched. They then repeated the exercise with the crackers and milk
but they distributed is unevenly. They observed from this that the babies stared
longer at the action of splitting the food up unevenly. After that was established
the scientist then decided to test the babies to see if they actually
comprehended what happened. They let them all play with toys and noted their
favorite one. They then brought a stranger into the room and asked the babies
for the toys. It was noted that the babies who stared longer at the first food
experiment were more “sharers” than the other babies that were labeled as “shellfish
sharers.” I wanted to go in more detail with this because I found it so intriguing
that the babies were only fifteen months old! My question to this is, do you
think that this would be considered observational learning, as in they learned
right from wrong from observing their parents or is it just Nature that plays
the role in this?
No comments:
Post a Comment